Grant strategies to build nonprofit capacity
- Published: Tuesday, 19 May 2020 11:58
Author: Andrew Callaghan
Being relatively new to the Strategic Grants’ team, the plan for my first blog was to layout the foundations of what grant makers want from measurement and evaluation. In reviewing previous Strategic Grants blogs, I came across a similar piece by our Director Jo Garner – “Funders want Outcomes”. Almost two years later, there has been some evolution, but certainly no revolution in measurement and evaluation.
Checklist of what Funders Want in Measurement and Evaluation
* Theory of Change
* Evidence your approach works
* Alignment to the grant makers funding focus
* Realistic goals for measurement
Theory of Change
The most fundamental piece of your measurement and evaluation work is your theory of change or logic model. While the actual document or end diagram is incredibly useful, the process in getting to that completed model is where the real value lies. The process of creating your theory of change forces you to understand the environment in which you are working in. You need to know the external factors that will influence your interventions or programs as well as being able to clearly articulate the outcomes you want to achieve and how they relate to your mission.
Developed correctly, the process engages your whole organisation, your stakeholders and the target groups of your programs. The result is a shared resource that guides your work, holds you accountable to stakeholders and allows for continuous improvement, as you compare your outcomes evidence against your theory of change.
Evidence your approach will work
At the beginning of my journey measuring and evaluating, I fell into the trap of thinking you need to prove anything and everything about your organisation’s work. There is a smarter and better way! Build on the work of others who have gone before you. You are most likely not the first person or organisation to tackle the issue or need you are addressing and guaranteed not to be the first to use all the different elements of your approach.
Therefore, there is a body of evidence that exists through academic studies, meta-analysis of interventions and other evaluation reports, which can provide solid evidence that an approach works and achieves certain outcomes. So, leverage this data and present it in your own work as evidence via literature review.
You will still need to build your own body of evidence that you are achieving these outcomes in your programs through monitoring progress and addressing any specific adaptations or changes that you have made to suit your target group.
How your project aligns to the funder’s priorities or funding focus
Funders have their own unique set of funding priorities or preferences. It is vitally important that you align your proposed projects to objectives and can demonstrate how you are helping them fulfill their goals.
You therefore need to be confident that your program’s outcomes and evidence base are credible and realistic. That does not mean you alter them each time you approach a funding opportunity, but you should make it easy for funders to understand how your project helps them in achieving their goals.
Philanthropic funders, particularly Private Ancillary Funds (PAFs’), will most often have a mixed portfolio of types of projects they support, and some will be willing to fund innovative and unproven approaches if the returns of it being successful are worth the risk. Trust and Foundations often see their role as venture capitalists for the not-for-profit sector, whose support can be used to leverage further investment from government and other funding bodies, to scale interventions.
Realistic Goals for Measurement
When applying for grants, it’s important to have realistic goals for measurement of outcomes. One of the key criteria that funders will base their decision on, is the outcomes you commit to. If you commit to a complex evaluation with large sample sizes, this is their expectation in the reporting.
Secondly, evaluation plans need to be relative to the project. Outlining the use of pre and post testing of participants and having a control group is probably over doing it for a small program contribution grant but would be a must for an unproven approach involving significant investment.
Funders also want you to be honest with your reporting. There is no value for anyone in disguising or omitting evaluation data from reports. The key is to use evaluation to continually adapt and refine your intervention to maximise its impact and address any negative outcomes that arise. Report your outcomes and engage funders in the work you are doing. Remember, many funders are prepared to fund the evaluation of your work as part of the grant request.
Journey to Impact Measurement
Measurement and evaluation are essential for both the grant maker and the grant recipient. I would highly advise being proactive in talking to funders about measurement and evaluation. With a strong culture of measurement in your organisation, you will meet and most likely exceed the expectations of funders.
Recent blog posts
- The role of a ‘Case for Support’ in securing funds for your organisation
- Q & A with one of our GEM Local subscribers - Pound Paws Inc.
- Positive (largely) funder news update from Jo Garner – let’s keep working together
- Viruses – Biological and Technological
- Grant-seeking in uncertain times
- Communications Beyond Clever Words – Using evidence to convince your supporters
- The ins and outs of outcomes and outputs – getting it right in your grant applications
- Retaining organisational knowledge is crucial to a successful grants program
- Strategic Grants Research Blog Series - Part 3
- The Musts for 2020 Grants Success!